The Yen-vestment Wave: Why Japanese Banks Are Suddenly Hungry for India
Two big deals, one clear pattern: Japan’s megabanks are moving beyond factories into Indian balance sheets, chasing growth and better spreads.
Yes Bank shares: SMBC acquires 20% stake from SBI & others banks
Yes Bank stake sale: described by Yes Bank as the single-largest cross-border investment in an Indian private sector bank
Japan’s MUFG to invest $4.45 billion on Shriram Finance in biggest FDI in Indian financial services
On the surface, these read like routine foreign investment headlines. Look closer and a cleaner pattern emerges. Japan’s megabanks are no longer just “present” in India. They are trying to own distribution, underwriting engines, and balance sheets in Indian financial services.
This is not random, and it is not purely India-led demand. It is a push-pull moment.
Three forces are converging.
First, Japan’s megabanks have balance-sheet capacity, but fewer high-return avenues at home. In a low-growth, ageing economy, piling into domestic government bonds protects capital, but it does not reliably grow it. India, by contrast, offers a larger credit runway and spreads that are structurally more attractive.
Second, governance and regulatory pressure in Japan has shifted from tolerance of idle capital to insistence on capital efficiency. That changes behaviour. When the domestic opportunity set is constrained, the next logical step is to redeploy into markets where credit growth is real and durable.
Third, India is offering deal availability in exactly the formats Japanese banks prefer. A stressed-but-stabilising private bank looking for a long-term strategic shareholder. A scaled NBFC with a proven lending machine that can absorb capital and grow. These are not venture-style bets. They are balance-sheet businesses with existing rails.
This is why Japanese banks look “late” to the party. For decades, Japan built India through factories and brands, Honda, Suzuki, Sony, Panasonic. The post-pandemic shift is that Japan is now buying something else: participation in India’s credit compounding.
You could see the first hint of this after the pandemic. In 2021, SMBC bought Fullerton India Credit, which was less about a single acquisition and more about acquiring a retail-credit engine and distribution footprint on the ground. The Yes Bank and Shriram Finance headlines are the next, larger expression of the same intent.
So the real question is not why these deals happened. It is why they are happening now, and what this wave of Japanese capital is trying to build inside India’s financial system.
The need, rather push, for expansion
Japan’s economy has been struggling from deflation and declining birth rates since the 1970s. Over the years, this has cascaded into lower demand for banking services, deposits and credit, discouraging the banks from expanding, while mopping up Government bonds and other sources of income to offset it.
On top of that, Japan faced its own set of banking crises in the 1990s, forcing domestic institutions to absorb bad loans, restricting overseas expansion.
Some Japanese firms traded at valuations that implied markets were discounting their ability to generate returns despite large balance sheets
For the Japanese banks, this meant seeing their profits pile up rather than being reinvested or returned to their investors, as the banks couldn’t find avenues that could help generate these returns.
This stagnation remained in place for almost two decades, even as the regulators didn’t do much about it. But that wouldn’t last, especially as Japan’s domestic economy showed no signs of change.
By 2023, the Japanese regulators were forced to act. They started to pressurize companies to improve capital efficiency by reinvesting them elsewhere, while also unwinding their cross holdings. These were investments in each other’s companies to cement business relationships and share risks.
Though liberalisation has seen many American, European and British banks set up shop in India, Japanese banks have been late to the party. But that is now set to change, with the Japanese aiming to deploy their capital to serve India’s growing credit market, infrastructure financing and a high loan growth.
For the Japanese, the challenge lies in converting their India opportunity into actionable results, and to weather all the storms that come their way.
The renewed interest, and the risks that come with it
Though these developments have been welcomed, the banks have to be wary of risks that may come up.
Asset quality cycle risk: The intense optimism and the hope of better future returns could mean lax underwriting for sanctioned loans. With most lenders serving high risk segments including MSMEs or first time retail borrowers, decreased oversight could result in an increase in NPAs, which, in turn, could affect long term return projections.
Regulatory constraints: Though the RBI has been increasingly welcoming to foreign investments, evolving policy changes could affect the Japanese bank’s investments, especially when external shocks, geopolitical changes or macroeconomic challenges could force policy shifts.
Integration and Governance: The Japanese may come with their own set of expectations from their Indian investments, which may not align with their Indian counterparts. Much depends on how they manage to align their expectations with on the ground realities, and how they work with their Indian counterparts to deploy their capital efficiently in the retail credit market.
As Japanese capital finds its way into Indian lenders, the real story will be less about the size of the cheque and more about what happens next: how quickly the capital is deployed, what quality of credit it creates, and whether these partnerships build durable franchises rather than one-time headline deals.
Disclaimer: This newsletter is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice or an offer/solicitation to buy or sell any securities. Views expressed are based on publicly available information as on the date of publication and may change without notice. If any past performance or return figures are mentioned, they are for context only, past performance may or may not be sustained in the future. Please consult a qualified financial adviser before making any investment decision.
Solid analysis of this stratgic shift. The redeployment angle really clarifies why these deals are happening now instead of earlier. I watched a similar pattern unfold with European banks in Southeast Asia around 2015, where idle capital at home forced a push into emerging financail markets. The real test will be whether Japanese banks can adapt their risk frameworks to India's retail lending dynamics.